See a Problem?
Thanks for telling us about the problem.
Friend Reviews
Reader Q&A
Posner has a reputation for careful and thorough research, and I figure if you're going to write an expose on the Vatican, you'd better make damn sure you're right.(less)
Community Reviews
Despite its pretensions to the contrary, the Catholic Church is a typical, in fact the prototypical, large-scale corporate organisation: complicated, more than occasionally corrupt, and intensely resistant to reform of any sort. The Vatican is where organisational policy not just religious doctrine is made and enforced.
Sexual scandal makes better press, but it is in finance that the system of ecclesial government is most dramatically out of control. Posner's analysis shows that thi
Can't Touch MeDespite its pretensions to the contrary, the Catholic Church is a typical, in fact the prototypical, large-scale corporate organisation: complicated, more than occasionally corrupt, and intensely resistant to reform of any sort. The Vatican is where organisational policy not just religious doctrine is made and enforced.
Sexual scandal makes better press, but it is in finance that the system of ecclesial government is most dramatically out of control. Posner's analysis shows that this condition is neither temporary or superficial but a result of the fundamental ethos of secrecy and the complete absence of even the most basic procedures for ensuring the integrity of accounts or the disposition of resources.
It might be supposed that the centralised power of the papacy would be sufficient to impose reform, at least within its direct reach inside the Vatican walls. Alas, dictatorship of any variety, including the religious, has some strange politics. Virtually any financial crime can be justified by anyone in the clerical hierarchy on the basis of protecting Mother Church's wealth, reputation, or the hierarchy itself.
It turns out that there is little agreement about the true economic interests of the Church not just among senior officials but within the bowels of the organisation. Consequently any attempt to implement procedures or controls on the movement of money, or even the recording of where it might be, is resisted as a matter of conscience and principle.
What Posner shows without explicit statement is that for at least the last two centuries, it has been in no one's interest to fix the situation. Large-scale money-laundering, currency manipulation, fraud by Individual clerics and their secular accomplices are all functional traits of an organisation intent on avoiding any external influences whatsoever.
In short, laxity in matters financial means freedom of action. The situation is not accidental or even incidental; it is purposeful and reflects what is really desired by the folk in charge. Although some token changes have been made - the employment of professional non-clerical managers, the belated association with international financial control organisations, the partial adoption of audited accounts - these are unlikely to have any lasting effect within an organisation that considers itself, as a matter of religious doctrine, to be beyond all rules.
...moreI would have liked to see drawings, portraits, photos, etc of the different Popes mentioned. It would have helped to identify them.
...moreIt appears that at least as far as financial behavior is concerned, the church has been drug, kicking and screaming, into the modern age, after being black-listed by the EU, and having numerous lawsuits and criminal charges brought against it. Maybe some of these changes will stick.
I found this book to be enlightening, but also very tedious, because of the large number of names and dates to keep track of. It's worth reading, but I didn't find it enjoyable. ...more
I'm convinced that's the only thing a sane person can feel toward the Catholic church after reading this book. Regardless of how you feel about God, one thing is abundantly clear: God is not in charge of this organization. Men are. Corrupt, conceited, self-centered, greedy, narrow-minded, short-sighted, cowardly men no better than anyone else on this green planet, and often a lot worse than some. If these douchebags have really been doing God's will fo
RAGE, rage against the dying of the light...I'm convinced that's the only thing a sane person can feel toward the Catholic church after reading this book. Regardless of how you feel about God, one thing is abundantly clear: God is not in charge of this organization. Men are. Corrupt, conceited, self-centered, greedy, narrow-minded, short-sighted, cowardly men no better than anyone else on this green planet, and often a lot worse than some. If these douchebags have really been doing God's will for the last 150 years, I want no part of their God. Thanks solely to this book, I had to add a new "merit" shelf to my bookshelves: "made me rage."
The first third of the book focuses heavily on the Vatican's role in allowing the Holocaust to happen, and allowing the Nazis to escape with their plunder when it was all over. While Posner makes it clear no one could ever prove the Vatican was laundering stolen Nazi money or smuggling Nazis out of Europe after the war, the circumstantial evidence leaves little room for doubt.
I don't think I've vread any book about the Holocaust, as horrible as it was, that literally made me cry tears of anguished fury. Most books about the Holocaust put you in the middle of the horror, and something in me withdraws as a matter of emotional protection. And they highlight the seeming inability of anyone to stop it, which promotes a feeling of helplessness that leads to a grim, dry-eyed hollowness.
But Pope Pius XII's repeated indifference and silence as millions of Jews were slaughtered and the proof was offered to him, and his repeated refusal to even directly mention it, let alone openly condemn the humanitarian cataclysm that was unfolding, in the face of repeated pleas, even as thousands of Jews were being marched past the Vatican literally in sight of his balcony, just opened my floodgates. He was more concerned about the damage a bombing raid did to a couple of buildings.
Pius had perhaps more power than any other single person on Earth to use his voice as a tool to mitigate or influence what was going on, and he refused to use it - not just once, but over and over. The fact that he, a man who held himself out as God's chosen representative on Earth, as a leading moral authority in the world, HAD the power to make a difference and refused... I think THAT's what made me literally sick to my stomach and made me weep with grief and frustrated fury. Don't even get me started on the laundering of stolen Nazi war plunder and the smuggling of Nazi fugitives out of Europe. It makes me wish I believed in Hell so I could picture those pieces of shit roasting in it right alongside their Nazi pals.
Remember that infamous shot of George W. Bush reading to schoolchildren on 9/11, that was circulated as evidence of his cluelessness and indifference? He's got nothing on Pius. During WWII, while he knew perfectly well what was going on, Pius XII devoted more energy to making a documentary about himself than to saving a single Jewish life or lifting a finger to mitigate Nazi atrocities against Jews. Yes, this is considerably different than the mainstream histories which paint Pius as a white knight. That's why they call it an expose.
You might ask, "But Switzerland also didn't take sides during the war or condemn the Holocaust. And Switzerland was also suspected of being a major center for laundering Nazi war plunder. Why no equivalent rage at Switzerland?" The answer is two-fold: (a) Switzerland doesn't hold itself out as the world's ultimate moral authority and keeper of God's will, and (b) when the time came to talk about reparations to the Jewish people for its role in laundering looted Jewish wealth, Switzerland eventually came (though dragged kicking and screaming) to the settlement table. The Vatican never relented and has not apologized nor paid a cent in Jewish reparations to this day.
But this is not a book that's just about WWII and the Holocaust. It covers the financial and political aspects of the Church's history from the late 19th century up to 2014, and virtually none of it makes the church look very good. Posner doesn't openly editorialize much – he doesn't have to. The facts alone are enough to leave you with a bad taste in your mouth.
Here's a quick rundown:
Part 1: How the church lost most of its papal estates in the late 19th century and had to learn to make money from money instead of making it from property. They despised Jews for making money and considered the pursuit of money immoral, but decided that having money is nicer than having the moral high ground.
Part 2: How the church sat back and watched Hitler slaughter millions of Jews and not only did nothing, but actively and repeatedly resisted pleas from numerous nations to speak out against the genocide as a moral authority. Oh, and no one can definitively prove it, due in no small part to the Vatican's 70 years of stonewalling, but the Vatican probably also laundered millions of dollars of Nazi war plunder, smuggled Nazi fugitives out of Europe after the war, and sheltered them in South America.
Part 3: How the church transformed itself in the postwar era into a global financial and corporate powerhouse, with investments in businesses so diverse they included casinos and porn publishers, answerable to no one, using a complex maze of shell corporations to escape regulation and taxation, as well as public scrutiny. During this 30-year period, the Vatican bank got itself embroiled in numerous financial scandals, some so sordid they inspired a subplot in The Godfather III. The troubles culminated in criminal charges in the early 1980s against the American archbishop, Paul Marcinkus, who had run the Vatican bank during most of this time, and left the Vatican in massive debt and with its worldwide reputation in tatters. Although the archbishop escaped conviction thanks to jurisdictional problems created by the Vatican's status as a sovereign state, several non-clergy bankers ended up serving long prison sentences... or dead. At best, it's a tale of incompetence, recklessness, and lack of oversight, and the alternative interpretations are worse. The best that can be said is that there's no indication any Pope was ever directly implicated... the worst they were guilty of was zero oversight and not taking an interest. The Vatican did end up paying a $244 million settlement because of this mess... which is $244 million more than the Jews got.
Part 4: How the church attempted to reform its financial life, but strangely still thought it was a good idea to continue making deals it had to keep secret because the participants knew they would create enormous scandals if they ever became public. Did they learn nothing from their troubles?
Part 5: How the church again came under fire for its role in the Holocaust in the 1990s, and specifically whether its millions included Nazi gold stolen from Holocaust victims. The church continued its traditional policy of silence, secrecy, deflection, denial, stonewalling, lying, and to this day it has never softened. It beat litigation in the United States on jurisdictional grounds.
Part 6: How, just when they thought they had beaten the Nazi gold rap, and could get back to work on repairing its world reputation, the Vatican got sidetracked by a little thing called the child sex abuse scandal, and again deployed its favorite weapons: silence, secrecy, deflection, denial, stonewalling, lying, jurisdiction. Rather than taking financial responsibility, the Vatican quickly restructured its organization to make sure it couldn't be held directly liable for the acts of individual priests – only their local diocese could, and a number of American dioceses went bankrupt in the resulting flood of litigation.
Part 7: How Pope Francis, a Jesuit and the Church's first-ever South American pope, came along in 2013 and gave the church a much-needed PR shot in the arm. He managed to brilliantly build a reputation as a liberal reformer without actually reforming any substantive church doctrine. However, Francis showed (or shows?) some hope of being a genuine and vigorous financial reformer and at press time, was rapidly moving the Vatican bank toward compliance with EU financial laws that may allow the Vatican to eventually shed its dark reputation as a tax and money laundering haven.
...moreSo with that I was eagerly anticipating a journey into the underbelly of Vatican politics and double-dealing from the time of Peter to our current Pope Francis. However, the early years were briefly to
"God's Bankers has it all: a rare exposé and an astounding saga marked by poisoned business titans, murdered prosecutors, mysterious deaths of private investigators, and questionable suicides; a carnival of characters from Popes and cardinals, financiers and mobsters, kings and prime ministers ..."So with that I was eagerly anticipating a journey into the underbelly of Vatican politics and double-dealing from the time of Peter to our current Pope Francis. However, the early years were briefly touched upon until we reach the reign of Gregory XVI (1831 - 1846) when the cash-strapped Church was looking for ways to boost their coffers. Thus, the age of lay-financiers, prelates and shady businessmen begins with the Church taking uncertain steps into the world of investment and money-lending. From the reign of Leo XIII the Vatican Bank steps tentatively onto the world stage whilst headed by a select group of financial outsiders, steering the Bank through revolutionary Italy, the stock-market crash and the creation of the Papal State - the Vatican City. It is in the 20th century that the Vatican Bank takes a rather interesting stance on Germany during the 1930s and 1940s - the Vatican has spread its investments thought Fascist Italy and Germany, and is at odds with itself over preserving financial independence and fighting communism or speaking out against documented atrocities. We then move forward through the years of assisting war criminals to the influx of dubious Italian and Sicilian businessmen into the banking hierarchy, and support for fledgling anti-communist movements worldwide.
This a is lengthy tome - with copious notes. It is not a light read - and the reader may find themselves re-reading past chapters.
...moreAfter that, it's mostly great stuff, with the caveat that he really does stick a whole bunch of stuff in there. It's not clear to me why the child-abuse stuff is in there, even allowing for the "and power" part of the subtitle; not clear why the papal elections stuff is in there (though that's a bit fresher, at least).
So, basically, there's 300 pages of roaring, roiling idiocy and corruption, and the odd attempt to reel it all in. Fun fact: the popes the most likely to try to deal with corruption are those who are the least publicly popular (so, not John XXIII, not JPII), up until Francis, who might just be pulling off the double act.
...moreDid you know the Roman Empire still exists today? Not as Italy. Italy is too wholly its own different thing to be considered Rome's evolutionary descendent. So too, the Holy Roman Empire essentially just became a proto-Germany rather than Rome's actual offspring. And the Byzantine
The dinosaurs never really went extinct. A lot of them did, but not all of them. Those that survived evolved and you see what became of the dinosaurs every day: birds. Dinosaurs persist because they learned how to fly.Did you know the Roman Empire still exists today? Not as Italy. Italy is too wholly its own different thing to be considered Rome's evolutionary descendent. So too, the Holy Roman Empire essentially just became a proto-Germany rather than Rome's actual offspring. And the Byzantine Empire is more like Rome's weird half-brother who hung around for a really long time while eventually dying out (more or less) because of the Turks.
No. The Roman Empire, that great political entity that marks the end of what's known as the Ancient Period of Western Civilization, burned out just a few centuries into the A.D. (or C.E. as they're trying to call it and teach students in classes now), birthing the Dark Ages and Medieval culture, replaced by the largest religious institution the world has ever known: The Roman Catholic Church (more colloquially: The Catholic Church).
This book, God's Bankers, being about the banking system of the Catholic Church and The Vatican, is one that immediately captured my attention. I'm not Catholic. I've never been Catholic. I will almost assuredly never BE Catholic. And yet I've always been utterly fascinated by the Catholic Church. Hell, the first thing I ever wrote as a writer involved The Catholic Church and The Pope (and may it one day see the light of day). It's cropped up in more of my writing than I've actually intended, and part of that is because it's such a regimented, caste-based religious institution, which, as an idea, is so foreign to me and the sects of Christianity I was exposed to as a child.
Up front, let me say that this book is in no way about Catholic dogma or the religious beliefs of the Catholic Church. It's exclusively interested in the banking system of the Vatican and the forces within (and without) the Vatican that feeds into that particular institution. It chains everything from the earliest needs of the Vatican for a banking system all the way to the reforms instituted as of mid-2014, taking digressions to explain not only the politics of the elections of various Popes, but also the financial dealings with important Vatican Bank investors like Michele Sidona and Roberto Calvi.
Posner (who I was unfamiliar with before this book) is a really, really talented writer who did an ungodly amount of research on this topic (the back 200+ pages of this book are all notes and bibliography that he collected over the ten years of research he invested. It's staggering, impressive, and he does an excellent job of condensing that information into easy-enough-to-understand concepts. Sure, there's points at which I got completely lost about the ins and out of who was investing what where, but that's to be expected in a book about banking and it was the sorta thing I just had to roll with. In that, the actual banking intricacies of this book were a struggle and mighty dense and difficult to get through.
The saving grace of this book? How utterly batsh*t insane the Vatican could be when it comes to their banking system (and other things) over the past 150 years. You have things like active bank accounts in the names of dead Cardinals, money laundering that makes Swiss Banks look clean, and completely insane connections and dealings with both laundering money for the Italian Mafia and spiriting away bonafide Nazis to South America by liquidating actual Nazi gold. Watching this institution descend into unbelievable corruption and criminal activity is jaw-dropping to say the least. To watch The Vatican respond to scandals by saying "this is slander" and "we are a soverign nation" is outlandish to the point where it's comical that they don't have any defense or anything to say when they get caught (and my god do they get caught what seems like hundreds of times over their morally questionable banking system).
All of those bits were things I ate up with a spoon. They were delicious in a way I hadn't even dreamed when I started, and if you knew all of the things I shared with anyone who was around me when I was reading it they would tell you the same. So honestly, if this book sounds like something you are interested in you should absolutely read it and see just how amazing this system is. Know that at a certain point it becomes almost impossible to keep track of all the names and acronyms participating in scandal after scandal after scandal, but man. Watching the dirty dealings of what is supposed to be the moral authority on planet earth deal with issues this almost completely unbelievable? Man, this was so much everything I wanted.
Oh, and everything the Church has ever done or said about the Holocaust and Anti-Semitism is unbelievable. I read this book, I still can't believe it. And how they handled the "Wow the Jews were robbed blind during the Holocaust and now they want some of those possessions (among other things gold, that was turned into Nazi Gold) paid back as reparations for, you know, mass theft and attempted genocide, is stupefying in its audacity. Truly, there's stuff in this book you have to read to believe. It will make your blood boil, but it will make you really consider the mentality of what it must be like to think you're Rome in a world where that left Rome behind almost 2,000 years ago.
...moreFrankly, I thought this was a poor example of what could have been an excellent book. The financial shenanigans that took place in Rome throughout history have always been fascinating, and central to much of world finance and history. Even the accusations that the Vatican funneled Nazi loot and Jewish plunder from the concentration camps is fascinating and horrifying. Posner, however, does not necessarily do this justice. He focuses more on the tabloid expose, rather than hard facts. He narrows in on coincidence to try and correlate events. He even has an entire chapter devoted to the name Nogora, who was the Vatican City's central banker of sorts, and who brilliantly funneled money from place to place during the war. Allied Intelligence Services listed a man under that name as a Nazi spy, but the author speculates, was it the same man? Was it a different man? And then goes on the insinuate even though he has little or no evidence either way. This was about the point where I decided I would stop reading.
The book has its positives, to be sure. It is interesting to examine the banking structure of a City State, as there are few left in the world. and one as historically important as the Vatican will always be interesting. This book, however, offers only a tantalizing glimpse into the internal finances and international clout of the Holy See, instead, filling the tome with insinuations on Nazi and Mafia connections which may or may not be true.
The author does not skimp on sources, and the book itself is refreshingly well sourced. Every other statement is sourced to completion, and the back source list is organized by chapter, making fact checking a breeze.
As you can probably see, this was a bit of a disappointment for me. It is interesting and well sourced, but the insinuations, guess work, and expose style writing leave a lot to be desired from a book supposedly about the Vatican City's historical financial and monetary policy. Instead it is a journalistic style book looking to drive home an accusatory point, not a professionally written historical analysis or financial outlook, which could have offered much more concrete evidence to the authors insinuations. Interesting material, poor delivery, I would not recommend this book.
...moreHe seems to be more interested in scandals than a thorough review of the Vatican Bank. And listen. I am a gay atheist so it is not like I am at all vested in the catholic church but can we deal with the vatica It just wasn't good. There was an incredible amount of information but not all of it was particularly relevant and there was almost no analysis of that information. I still don't have the greatest understanding of the Vatican Bank even though I slogged through almost 800 pages of this tome.
He seems to be more interested in scandals than a thorough review of the Vatican Bank. And listen. I am a gay atheist so it is not like I am at all vested in the catholic church but can we deal with the vatican bank and leave all the other tangents for another time? ...more
If I was not an atheist before, this book would be the last nail.... It is very detailed and tough to follow but I stuck with it hoping that at some point the church will redeem itself and prove that it has SOME value.... Not the case.... Catholics should be made to read this instead of the bible.....
This book starts out promising - a successful banker, with significant ties to the Vatican, hanging dead under a bridge. Suicide or murder? Who knows!
From there, unfortunately, we dive into an uninspired recounting of some of the important moments in the history of the Catholic Church, with a stop-and-go focus on its banking issues. I think the problem the author encountered was a lack of material. The history of the Catholic Church is staggeringly long, but there did not seem to b
What a slog!This book starts out promising - a successful banker, with significant ties to the Vatican, hanging dead under a bridge. Suicide or murder? Who knows!
From there, unfortunately, we dive into an uninspired recounting of some of the important moments in the history of the Catholic Church, with a stop-and-go focus on its banking issues. I think the problem the author encountered was a lack of material. The history of the Catholic Church is staggeringly long, but there did not seem to be banking-only material to fill those vast swaths of emptiness. And what did fill them was often tedious and repetitious: 1. The Church was behind the times; 2. Some people wanted to bring the Church up to modern speed; 3. Those people faced resistance from traditionalists; 4. Reform did occur, but slowly.
To be sure, there are interesting moments. Clearly the Vatican bank was a profitable place to launder money for some unsavory Italian fellows, and clearly there were lots of corrupt insiders who sought to personally benefit from a lack of oversight. But the author either lacked the information or the authorial talent to give either of these potentially steamy issues any pop or pizzazz. Instead, what we get is a largely just a series of descriptions of events and people (most of whom have Italian names that, admittedly, I had a very hard keeping track of) without much depth or personality. Only the various Popes stood out as having interesting, conflicted personalities. The Popes' underlings were interchangeable and (in a book covering as much history as this did) fleeting.
The other issue I had was that the focus jumped around so much. The book spends huge amounts of time on the priest sex scandals in the 90s and 2000s as well as the Church's engagement during WW2. Both of these are interesting, and the latter did have some interaction with its financial dealings (especially inasmuch as the Church may have taken in Nazi money), but these tangents seemed more like the author's port in a storm of boringness. If you can't write an engaging book about the history of Vatican banking, perhaps you shouldn't try to write a book about the history of Vatican banking?
I think the author would have been better served narrowing his focus. It is obviously possible to write excellent books about banking (Smartest Guys in the Room, Rise and Fall of LTCM, All the Devils Are Here, just to name a few). But these books focused on individual crises and the personalities of the key individuals surrounding them. You actually got to know the various CEOs and the other players. Perhaps the author could not locate a key pivotal moment that would be worth diving into. But even a series of more focused vignettes might have been better.
Anyway, nice idea, so-so execution, probably only recommended for individuals with an especial interest in this topic.
...moreFrom the author's interview with Steven Colbert, I thought this book would go deep in history and keep a focus on the money and a sort of financial intrigue. Like one of the 5 post-crisis hardbacks of form
This just wasn't the book I expected to read. You won't understand the moment of the book (Francis' modernization - though is this about murder? atonement for ww2 and mafia connections?? exposing the burden of modern financial regulation???) until the last chapter and the last two of 513 pages.From the author's interview with Steven Colbert, I thought this book would go deep in history and keep a focus on the money and a sort of financial intrigue. Like one of the 5 post-crisis hardbacks of former bankers or NYT journalists that are trending at any given point since then. Instead, its theme scandal, with occasional loose ties to a secretive institution that from what I gather was the church's investment bank.
God's Bankers felt too much like a data dump written in the form of a law review article (if you've ever had the pleasure). Informative despite its punishing style, I'd recommend only to the most patient and interested of readers.
...moreI had hoped to find a book full of intrig Although well reasearched and written, this book is not fast paced, nor about God's Banker. It contains some pages on the actual financing done by the Vatican, and 600 pages that you could find in other books about the Vatican. It goes through all of the Popes, how they were elected, their personal habbits, reforms, the growth of catholic religion in Italy, Europe and America, WWI and WWII, the holocaust and almost tries to avoid talking about financing.
I had hoped to find a book full of intrigue and back alley finances and instead found a very long history lesson. The history was interesting and if that is what you are looking for you have found it. But the finance part that the title and summary suggests is sparse. Some information on hidden gold and possible Nazi ties, but I just wish it had been 400 pages shorter. ...more
In short, he lifts a lid on one an institution shrouded in mystery and intrigue. He spins a real-life action drama than includes a whole host of other entities.
If you like thrillers, you are sure to love this book.
Posner's first book, Mengele, a 1986 biography of the Nazi "Angel of Death" Josef Mengele, was the result of a pro-bono lawsuit Posner brought on behalf of surviving twins from Auschwitz. Since then he has written ten other books from the Pulitzer Prize-finalist Case Closed, to bestsellers on political assassinations, organized crime, national politics, and 9/11 and terrorism. His upcoming God's Bankers has spanned nine years of research and received early critical praise.
ohn Martin of ABC News says "Gerald Posner is one of the most resourceful investigators I have encountered in thirty years of journalism." Garry Wills calls Posner "a superb investigative reporter. "Posner, a former Wall Street lawyer, demolishes myths through a meticulous re-examination of the facts," reported the Chicago Tribune. "Meticulous research," Newsday.
Anthony Lewis in The New York Times: "With 'Killing the Dream, he has written a superb book: a model of investigation, meticulous in its discovery and presentation of evidence, unbiased in its exploration of every claim. And it is a wonderfully readable book, as gripping as a first-class detective story."
"What we need is a work of painstakingly honest journalism, a la Case Closed, Gerald Posner's landmark re-examination of the assassination of John F. Kennedy," concluded Joe Sharkey in The New York Times.
Gene Lyons, in Entertainment Weekly: "As thorough and incisive a job of reporting and critical thinking as you will ever read, Case Closed does more than buttress the much beleaguered Warren Commission's conclusion ….More than that, Posner's book is written in a penetrating, lucid style that makes it a joy to read. Even the footnotes, often briskly debunking one or another fanciful or imaginary scenario put forth by the conspiracy theorists, rarely fail to enthrall...Case Closed is a work of genuine patriotism and a monument to the astringent power of reason. 'A'"
Jeffrey Toobin in the Chicago Tribune: "Unlike many of the 2,000 other books that have been written about the Kennedy assassination, Posner's Case Closed is a resolutely sane piece of work. More importantly, 'Case Closed' is utterly convincing in its thesis, which seems, in light of all that has transpired over the past 30 years, almost revolutionary....I started Case Closed as a skeptic - and slightly put off by the presumptuous title. To my mind historical truth is always a slippery thing. The chances of knowing for sure what happened in any event - much less one as murky as the Kennedy assassination - seem remote. But this fascinating and important book won me over. Case closed, indeed."
Based in the mixed realms of politics, history, and true crime, his articles - from The New York Times to The New Yorker to Newsweek, Time and The Daily Beast - have prompted Argentina to open its hidden Nazi files to researchers; raised disturbing questions about clues the FBI missed in the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing; sparked a reinvestigation of the Boston Strangler; and exposed Pete Rose's gambling addiction, which led to his ban from baseball.
Posner was one of the youngest attorneys (23) ever hired by Cravath, Swaine & Moore. A Political Science major, Posner was a Phi Beta Kappa and Summa Cum Laude graduate of the University of California at Berkeley (1975), where he was also a national debating champion, winner of the Meiklejohn Award. At Hastings Law School (1978), he was an Honors Graduate and served as the Associate Executive Editor for the Law Review. Of Counsel to Posner & Ferrar
...moreRelated Articles
Welcome back. Just a moment while we sign you in to your Goodreads account.
Source: https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/22609469-god-s-bankers
Posted by: xiomaraxiomarareglerowe0266435.blogspot.com
0 Comments